| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
spiralvoice
Sage
Joined: 06 Jan 2003
Posts: 3983
Location: Germany
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:22 pm Post subject: New patchpack: 2.5.28q |
 |
|
Command patches was replaced with buildinfo.
Patch 3707: Use Ocaml 3.08.2 instead of 3.08.0 when no Ocaml is installed yet
Patch 3708: Some backports from 2-5-29ab
Patch 3715: Some care for options
removed patch 3291: Missing Date Header in Emails, did not work
Patch 3157: Send core update message to "new mldonkey"
Patch 3717: improvement of patch 3672 (additonally bugfix for wrong Hi/Lo-ID in serverlist)
Patch 3719: New command: buildinfo
updated patch 3461: [EDK] Fix some bugs, updated tweak_commonSources.2-5-28-fixed.patch
_________________
Link overview and precompiled cores here: http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/DownloadLinks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
atordo
user
Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
A couple of comments about this release:
1) Configure doesn't find system ocaml install. Linking patches to /usr does the trick.
2) Configure tries to exec 'uname -o', an option which my uname (Linux) doesn't have. Then 'buildinfo' displays: | Code: | | Core was built with Ocaml 3.08.2 on i686 2.4.29-grsec |
Shouldn't it be 'uname -s'?
Thank you'all for keeping mldonkey up to date. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spiralvoice
Sage
Joined: 06 Jan 2003
Posts: 3983
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| atordo wrote: | | 1) Configure doesn't find system ocaml install. Linking patches to /usr does the trick. |
What does "ocamlc -v" say? Or config.log when Ocaml is not found in the first place.
| atordo wrote: | 2) Configure tries to exec 'uname -o', an option which my uname (Linux) doesn't have. Then 'buildinfo' displays: | Code: | | Core was built with Ocaml 3.08.2 on i686 2.4.29-grsec |
Shouldn't it be 'uname -s'? |
I updated patch 3719 which will be in the next patchpack.
_________________
Link overview and precompiled cores here: http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/DownloadLinks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
conradj
user
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 57
Location: Swirling clouds of Jupiter
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
i want to add my appreciation to atordo's and say as well: Thank you guys for continuing the development of mldonkey, and also for keeping it so friendly around here.
cj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Countess
neophyte
Joined: 12 May 2003
Posts: 46
Location: NL
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i updated from patch o tot q en kept everything else the same (just replaced the mlnet file in my running directory)
but now a get quite a few log errors that i didnt have befor.
| Code: | [ERROR CommonSwarming]: BAD WRITE
received: file_pos:63565824 string:25 6144
ranges:
range: 63528960-[63559680]-63713280 next: 63713280
block: 6[1] 58368000-68096000 [partial] first range: 63528960(153600)
range: 63713280-[63713280]-63897600 next: 63897600 prev: 63528960
block: 6[1] 58368000-68096000 [partial] first range: 63528960(153600)
range: 63897600-[63897600]-64081920 next: 64081920 prev: 63713280
block: 6[1] 58368000-68096000 [partial] first range: 63528960(153600)
Unused source tag [\021]
Unused source tag [\021]
SessMsgNetworkStats
******* sending PONG
SessMsgNetworkStats
******* sending PONG
******* sending PONG
SessMsgNetworkStats
******* sending PONG
******* sending PONG
exception in get_md4 1 s=\147
******* sending PONG
Options correctly saved on localtime: 4/ 2, 13:31:20
REMOVE OLD SERVERS
Delay to detect black-listed servers: 0.00
Delay to detect old servers: 0.00
Delay to finally remove servers: 0.00
REMOVE 42 OLD SERVERS DONE
BAD BAD BAD: number of chunks is different 221/347 for 5F888C0DCA97EB73AA2E14CD8DCEC417:3367000064 on peer
Peer info: name=[http://emule-project.net] md4=[B09C784FDD0E03C98ACB6D01F7286FE2] overnet=[false] brand=[eMule]
BAD BAD BAD: number of chunks is different 221/347 for 5F888C0DCA97EB73AA2E14CD8DCEC417:3367000064 on peer
Peer info: name=[http://emule-project.net] md4=[B09C784FDD0E03C98ACB6D01F7286FE2] overnet=[false] brand=[eMule]
[ERROR CommonSwarming]: BAD WRITE
received: file_pos:488077312 string:25 6144
ranges:
range: 488058880-[488071168]-488243200 next: 488243200
block: 50[1] 486400000-496128000 [partial] first range: 488058880(172032)
range: 488243200-[488243200]-488427520 next: 488427520 prev: 488058880
block: 50[1] 486400000-496128000 [partial] first range: 488058880(172032)
range: 488427520-[488427520]-488611840 next: 488611840 prev: 488243200
block: 50[1] 486400000-496128000 [partial] first range: 488058880(172032)
[ERROR CommonSwarming]: BAD WRITE
received: file_pos:350963712 string:25 6144
ranges:
range: 350945280-[350957568]-351129600 next: 351129600
block: 36[1] 350208000-359936000 [partial] first range: 350945280(172032)
range: 351129600-[351129600]-351313920 next: 351313920 prev: 350945280
block: 36[1] 350208000-359936000 [partial] first range: 350945280(172032)
range: 351313920-[351313920]-351498240 next: 351498240 prev: 351129600
block: 36[1] 350208000-359936000 [partial] first range: 350945280(172032) |
the files seemed fine on the other version but now i get these quite frequently
download speeds are fine thou but a lot of integratie checks failing.
as far as i know common swarming isnt even on, atleast i didnt do anything with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
conradj
user
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 57
Location: Swirling clouds of Jupiter
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some of the logging might be a result of the backport from 2.5.29ab. At least that's what the page for the patch seems to say.
--Could some folks give me help on compiling a profiling version of the core? i'd like to see where 2/5 of my CPU goes. i'd need fairly specific directions on compiling and more general ones for how to run it.
And of course, some idea as to whether it's going to corrupt all the files i'm trying to download, frag my disks to sand, and completely expunge the remaining vestiges of my sorry social life.
cj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
atordo
user
Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| spiralvoice wrote: | | atordo wrote: | | 1) Configure doesn't find system ocaml install. Linking patches to /usr does the trick. |
What does "ocamlc -v" say? Or config.log when Ocaml is not found in the first place. |
ocaml -v:
| Code: | | Standard library directory: /usr/local/lib/ocaml |
Anyway, with patch pack 28r config finds ocaml with no problem  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
