| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
chemical
user
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Germany
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:15 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I assume that servers are only removed after 3 pings if update_server_list = true?
Can someone comment on this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Knocker
professional
Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| buildid wrote: | with sancho -gui :
i see no cllients and sources in the transfer tab , speed is oke . |
I have no problems here with sancho 0.9.4-30 GTK-version.
| Quote: |
I assume that servers are only removed after 3 pings if update_server_list = true?
|
No, I consider the server as dead if it doesn't respond after 3 times. Should I raise this number?
update_server_list is meant for getting new servers from other servers and clients. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rebel2k
user
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 58
Location: Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chemical
user
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Knocker"] | buildid wrote: | with sancho -gui :
| Quote: |
I assume that servers are only removed after 3 pings if update_server_list = true?
|
No, I consider the server as dead if it doesn't respond after 3 times. Should I raise this number?
update_server_list is meant for getting new servers from other servers and clients. |
I'm using the 2.5.16v for a long while now and I'm very pleased. But the server removal problem appeared to even more critical than I thought.
The 2.5.16v is now up for nearly 24 days (23+23:1 and it cleared its server list several times. After about 1 week of uptime the serverlist was cleared from 134 to the 3 the core is still connected to. Did a 'servers server.met' and the game started over again. After a week the core was again back to 3 servers.
Do you remove the servers after 3 pings regardless of their collected points? Or what is this number in brackets directly after the name of 'vm'?
Can you please change update_server_list back to the original code (static serverlist)? Or please add a auto_remove_server or something. I need to look after my client now every few days. I did not need to do that before..
I want to maintain the serverlist for myself. Is it possible? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fabtar
Sage
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1575
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Knoker ,is there a way to doa static server list like in emule???
Emuel has a great option to order conencting only to static server.
Mldonkey should have a simlar option: you can limit the conection to this (not deletable) static servers and enable connction to other servers only if all static servers are offline (relating t a sucess ratio??).
What do you think??is difficult to implement???
cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Knocker
professional
Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you guys saw the new option "server_lifetime"?
It's a number representing server-pings before servers are removed. Set it to 100.000 and the servers shouldn't be removed anmore.
| fabtar wrote: |
Emuel has a great option to order conencting only to static server.
|
How can mldonkey distinguish between static and non-static servers?
Last edited by Knocker on Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chemical
user
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, that server_lifetime value was new to me, thanks!
Changed it to 100000 and will have a look at it!
Keep up the good work, 2.5.16v is the best release ever. I tried the 28, 29 and 30 fork - but everytime I came back to 16v!
Looking forward for another release!
bye
chemical |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fabtar
Sage
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1575
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By using emule I have understood that "static server" is not a server with static ip, but simply is a "flag" indicating that this server is adeed to a set called "static" by the user.
I suppose it does it mean like set of servers "not erasable because preferred".
You can call them "preferred server".
There is an option to say to emule... Hey, connect only to static servers!!!
I hope to have not misundeestood the emule's options.
what do you think about? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Knocker
professional
Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fabtar wrote: |
There is an option to say to emule... Hey, connect only to static servers!!!
what do you think about? |
Could be interesting.
I didn't forget your suggestion in the new release. I just hadn't the time to implement it. I will see what I can do in this issue for next one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fabtar
Sage
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1575
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like to do suggestions, I understand perfectly the lack of time and I think the feedback here has quite good level jet ... in emule's forum the developers don't reply to the messages(or very rare casue the big traffic).
I'm happy that this feature sounds good.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
