| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Knocker
professional
Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Location: Germany
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:07 am Post subject: Release Mulus 0.17.4 |
 |
|
| Code: |
MLDonkey Mulus
--------------
Release 0.17.4
--------------
WebUI:
* rewriting big parts of HTML-Output
* display comments from other clients in Transfers/ScanTemp
* fix problem with frameset if it was put in another/userdefined frameset
* new Table for new options
* rearrange options in WebUI
* sorting of "Transfer->Download"-Table is now remembered via Cookie
* fix error: column "last seen complete" in WebUI didn't show "never"
* Send pages gzipped (backport from 2.6)
* sort dropdown list of filename alternatives
* change filename in edit box when changing by dropdownbox
telnet:
* "voo" now has categories
* "options" is now functioning (but still be needed?)
* add new arguments for "vd" for sorting output "sort_age", "sort_name", "sort_remain"
* change "human readable" format in output of "vd"
* exchange column "downloaded" into "remaining"
regarding options and commands:
* new options:
* options to toggle between two sets of max_hard_*_rates (use 'bw_toggle' or Web-Button)
* max_hard_upload_rate_2
* max_hard_download_rate_2
* html_use_gzip
* seen_clients_intervall
* remove options
* emule_mods_showall
* html_mods_human_readable
* url_in_mail
* remove commands ovtst, ovtst2
* new command
* bw_toggle
* new button in WebUI "Transfer->toggle bw max"
interna:
* rename "urn_ed2k_"-temp-files by removing this prefix
* remove asking friends every half an hour for shared-file-list
* cut statistics for client-mods (csm)
* remove messages SIGCHILD and SIGPIPE from logfile
* add message of corrupted chunks in logfile
* keep incoming files shared
* put at least 200 sources in client queue
* try to reduce the "outside of queues" sources
* connect less often to indirect sources
* better stats about "seen" clients (md4 stored)
* "filerequests" are now the old "seen"-count
* ban sources which offer files with different chunk-size
* source-management
* hope to found the bug regarding too many sources in interfaces
* put sources with A4AF in noChunks-queue
* put MLDK as left_bytes back in ed2k-hello-message
* check for mldonkey_conmand if "netcat" or "nc" is the toolname
|
You can find a statically linked core under this address:
http://rapidshare.de/files/6950448/mulus.static.gz.html
Or the complete distribution:
http://rapidshare.de/files/6950542/mldonkey-mulus-0.17.4.static.i686-Linux.tar.bz2.html
If you like the source, grab it from
https://opensvn.csie.org/mlnet/tags/mldonkey-mulus-0.17.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fabtar
Sage
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1575
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Working strong and well since a day! A very robust release!
No noticable problems!
NOTE;The bw_toggle needs to be called by writing command there is a little issue about the webinterface button. Quite a marginal issue.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Knocker
professional
Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
And the sorting is wrong in some tables of the WebUI (eg search results sorted by size) 
I hope to gather some of those glitches and will eventually release a 0.18.0 next weekend.
But please test this version.
If you have problems with the WebUI, state the browser you are using within your bugreport. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fabtar
Sage
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1575
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Right... I have not noted this , perhaps I'm blind ... I'm trying all panels now.
I'm trying changin' settings too to verify their functionality.
I'll advice another known user to report problems to me.
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kinuris
user
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 86
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
Some weeks ago, I've been forced to abandon mldonkey (and mulus) because it saturates my WXP network interface (I cannot get e-mail, nor browse the net...) I can access inet from another computer, so the router is working ok. Mldonkey 2.6.7 has same effect, but when you say: | Quote: | | hope to found the bug regarding too many sources in interfaces |
Are you talking about this problem ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Knocker
professional
Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kinuris wrote: |
| Quote: | | hope to found the bug regarding too many sources in interfaces |
Are you talking about this problem ? |
No, this is another problem.
But did you try Mulus? It uses much less connections than MLdonkey. If there are still too many, you may lower max_connections_per_second, max_opened_connections, max_indirect_connections, max_sources and/or max_concurrent_downloads.
I have good download rates with
max_connections_per_second = 5
max_opened_connections = 150
max_indirect_connections =75
max_sources = 10000
max_sources_per_file = 2000
But I'm no powerleecher and it often takes up to 2 hours before I get download-rates beyond 20 kbps. Mulus is running at most 10-12 hours per day and my stats are:
| Code: |
Total Uptime: 12 days 0:44 hours
Client Brand| seen | Downloads | Uploads | Banned | Requests
------------+--------------+--------------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
unknown | 4384 1%| 94.0 0.1 0%| 23.3 0.0 0%| 0 0%| 4469 0%
new mldonkey| 2 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%| 8 0%
eMule | 281627 88%| 15418.1 15.2 80%| 9216.1 9.1 70%| 1079 69%| 1571864 85%
trusted mld | 4513 1%| 1161.2 1.1 6%| 872.7 0.9 7%| 142 9%| 57693 3%
xMule | 10 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%| 19 0%
shareaza | 3254 1%| 374.2 0.4 2%| 375.6 0.4 3%| 245 16%| 36011 2%
aMule | 3127 1%| 263.1 0.3 1%| 381.1 0.4 3%| 50 3%| 21679 1%
lPhant | 412 0%| 12.0 0.0 0%| 5.0 0.0 0%| 2 0%| 3350 0%
ePlus | 11344 4%| 1299.0 1.3 7%| 771.0 0.8 6%| 17 1%| 68107 4%
eDkHybrid | 10758 3%| 595.4 0.6 3%| 1479.6 1.5 11%| 19 1%| 95846 5%
Hydranode | 1 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%| 1 0%
------------+--------------+--------------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
Total | 319432 | 19217.0 18.9 | 13124.2 12.9 | 1554 | 1859056
|
It's good enough for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kinuris
user
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 86
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | max_connections_per_second = 5
max_opened_connections = 150
max_indirect_connections =75
max_sources = 10000
max_sources_per_file = 2000
|
Now testing. I will tell you tomorrow.
Regards. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pango
Sage
Joined: 31 Oct 2002
Posts: 2436
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kinuris wrote: | | Some weeks ago, I've been forced to abandon mldonkey (and mulus) because it saturates my WXP network interface (I cannot get e-mail, nor browse the net...) |
Starting with SP2, XP cannot keep more than 10 connections "half-open" at any time.
That's supposed to reduce the effect of virus-infected Windows boxen on the Internet.
This is also a problem with some programs, like P2P clients (Microsoft doesn't care, it doesn't sell P2P products yet).
Explanation, patcher : http://lvllord.de/?lang=en&url=tools |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kinuris
user
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 86
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pango wrote: | | kinuris wrote: | | Some weeks ago, I've been forced to abandon mldonkey (and mulus) because it saturates my WXP network interface (I cannot get e-mail, nor browse the net...) |
Starting with SP2, XP cannot keep more than 10 connections "half-open" at any time.
That's supposed to reduce the effect of virus-infected Windows boxen on the Internet.
This is also a problem with some programs, like P2P clients (Microsoft doesn't care, it doesn't sell P2P products yet).
Explanation, patcher : http://lvllord.de/?lang=en&url=tools |
Yes, I've tried with 50, 250 and 500(now), but nothing seems to help. What kills me is that emule and lphant work ok (I know they are win32 natives, but...)
By the way, this (mulus 0.17.4 rebel2k binary) is running fine by now, but seems I begin to have some time-outs with DNS resolving.
and... Is my problem reported by other people? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kinuris
user
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 86
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:42 am Post subject: Reporting.... |
|
|
My stats: | Code: | Total Uptime: 0 days 18:27 hours
Client Brand| seen | Downloads | Uploads | Banned | Requests
------------+--------------+--------------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
unknown | 839 4%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 3 5%| 843 0%
new mldonkey| 1 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%| 1 0%
eMule | 19901 86%| 831.0 12.8 81%| 2078.0 32.0 84%| 15 24%| 164909 87%
trusted mld | 104 0%| 7.8 0.1 1%| 46.7 0.7 2%| 0 0%| 1673 1%
shareaza | 152 1%| 41.2 0.6 4%| 0.8 0.0 0%| 28 44%| 2404 1%
aMule | 150 1%| 19.7 0.3 2%| 103.5 1.6 4%| 0 0%| 1837 1%
lPhant | 340 1%| 14.9 0.2 1%| 79.2 1.2 3%| 0 0%| 3414 2%
ePlus | 1181 5%| 58.3 0.9 6%| 132.2 2.0 5%| 15 24%| 10197 5%
eDkHybrid | 363 2%| 51.0 0.8 5%| 26.0 0.4 1%| 2 3%| 3890 2%
------------+--------------+--------------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
Total | 23031 | 1024.0 15.8 | 2466.2 38.0 | 63 | 189168
|
I'm sure it did not work with the last release I tried, so something has changed now.
So is working OK. Now I need some more download power  . Go to ask to the "problems with mulus" forum.
Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fabtar
Sage
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1575
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have no understood if you have sucesfully used Mulus 17.4 or last 2.6.7 release.
Your download power greatly depends on the number o sources and number of files you are downlaoding. Mldonkey has a fairly good download "power", differences between mldonkey and my father's emule are quite marginal.
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kinuris
user
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 86
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fabtar wrote: | I have no understood if you have sucesfully used Mulus 17.4 or last 2.6.7 release.
|
I mean BEFORE turn to emule. I think it was 2.6.4 and for mulus 0.17.3 (or .2?)
2.6.7 is not working for me. It is killing my computer's net interface.
| Quote: |
Your download power greatly depends on the number o sources and number of files you are downlaoding. Mldonkey has a fairly good download "power", differences between mldonkey and my father's emule are quite marginal. |
Now I'm downloading my real downloads (not too much sources) and testing downloads, with a lot of sources (you know, just search for "sex avi" or so, isos from some linux distributions...) and I'm getting lower downloads rates than using emule (1.4:1). My stats:
| Code: | otal Uptime: 1 days 12:31 hours
Client Brand| seen | Downloads | Uploads | Banned | Requests
------------+--------------+--------------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
unknown | 1683 3%| 18.6 0.1 1%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 7 6%| 1700 0%
new mldonkey| 2 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%| 7 0%
eMule | 41748 86%| 2069.1 16.1 78%| 3812.4 29.7 77%| 24 20%| 354172 87%
trusted mld | 240 0%| 33.6 0.3 1%| 55.7 0.4 1%| 0 0%| 3778 1%
shareaza | 418 1%| 91.7 0.7 3%| 9.4 0.1 0%| 66 55%| 6248 2%
aMule | 340 1%| 32.8 0.3 1%| 103.5 0.8 2%| 0 0%| 3786 1%
lPhant | 701 1%| 39.7 0.3 1%| 80.9 0.6 2%| 0 0%| 7444 2%
ePlus | 2641 5%| 201.7 1.6 8%| 408.0 3.2 8%| 20 17%| 23542 6%
eDkHybrid | 918 2%| 163.1 1.3 6%| 469.5 3.7 10%| 2 2%| 8767 2%
------------+--------------+--------------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
Total | 48691 | 2650.4 20.6 | 4939.3 38.5 | 119 | 409444 |
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Enig
neophyte
Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Posts: 22
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knocker,
There's a lite version of secure identification by owe, see
[url]obsolete_url[/url]
I'd like to know if you can add secure user identification in the next release. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Knocker
professional
Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 612
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm not sure why using a C program anyway. There is an OCaml library "cryptokit" is it broken? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Enig
neophyte
Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Posts: 22
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@Knocker, you're right.
Mldonkey 2.6.x series used CryptoPP lib for the reason that the process of sui not been understanded. Now, since owe have figured out the processing of sui, yes, CryptoKit lib can be utilized. Please do it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
