| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
spiralvoice Sage
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 3982 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ZeusII wrote: | | Well, actually I have three mlnet processes at the sametime (with consecutive PIDs, being everyone a child from the other) |
These are threads, MLDonkeys real pid can be found in the file mlnet.pid,
residing in the directory where downloads.ini can be found. _________________ Link overview and precompiled cores here: http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/DownloadLinks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fabtar Sage

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 1575 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
147 is a fair value for mlnet, I'm very curious about who are the process/esses(and why) which are using the other 850 file descriptors?? Perhaps you have other services, NAT/squid/database/webserver which are using a lot of file descriptors.
Good reboot
P.s: I also suggest to retry the fd count using the PID pointed by spiralvoice _________________ ARM,ARMEL,MIPS,MIPSEL,POWERPC mldonkey cores: http://fabtar.ygrek.org.ua/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZeusII neophyte

Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm running Samba 3.0.20b (I know, it's a little outdated, but it's what comes by default. Still have to try 3.0.25b -latest- and see if it works ok and if it's still configurable from web interface), TwonkyVision 4.4 (waiting for 4.4.1 to be released for nas's, maybe that proggie is what takes a lot of filedescriptors) and OpenSSH 4.5.1.1.
Since last reboot it's been 18 hours without mldonkey crashing, before crashed at 4 fours of running.
lsof | grep MLNET-PID | wc -l is at 138 and total is at 1646
well, since it was running 25 days (with mldonkey running likely every day) without crashing, I'm fine with that. One reboot a month is nothing ^^*
again, let me say: great work!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZeusII neophyte

Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi there!
I rolled back to 2.8.7 I was using before and I see that it works a lot better, faster speeds on the same torrents, see's more peers, etc.
Also, I'm seeing that with 2.9.0CVS I can't force mldonkey to connect to more edk servers, neither from console or sancho.
Maybe 2.9.0CVS is a little buggy, I supose you used lattest CVS source? Maybe we could try with latest released version source code
Info about the 2.8.7 I'm using:
| Code: |
--Buildinfo--
Version: MLNet Multi-Network p2p client version 2.8.7
Networks: Global Shares Direct Connect Gnutella G2 Fasttrack FileTP BitTorrent Donkey (SUI)
Ocaml version: 3.08.3 - C compiler version: 3.3.5 - C++ compiler version: 3.3.5
Built on: Linux ppc 2.4.22-uc0 (big endian) (Warning: glibc version mismatch, 2.3.3 present on your system, MlDonkey was compiled with 2.3.2)
Configure args: '--enable-directconnect'
Features: threads zlib-1.2.3 bzip2-1.0.2 gd(jpg/png-1.2.18) iconv(active) magic(inactive) no-check-bounds |
Edit: now running with Samba 3.0.25b  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiralvoice Sage
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 3982 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ZeusII wrote: | | I rolled back to 2.8.7 I was using before and I see that it works a lot better, faster speeds on the same torrents, see's more peers, etc. |
Please try 2.9.0 with max_hard_download_rate != 0 _________________ Link overview and precompiled cores here: http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/DownloadLinks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fabtar Sage

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 1575 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that linux users should have minimal programmin' base but to be safe:
"!=" means "different from"
I also think that C language has to be adopted as new Esperanto  _________________ ARM,ARMEL,MIPS,MIPSEL,POWERPC mldonkey cores: http://fabtar.ygrek.org.ua/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZeusII neophyte

Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
already tried that.
what I see is that 2.9.0CVS doesn't connect to the same number of sources, neither in edk or torrent, slowing torrents a lot.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZeusII neophyte

Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi again. been trying a little more.
with 2.8.7 works just fine. 2.9.0CVS build ends being unnable to resolve DNS and then a little bit later shutdowns itself. this happens no matter how many torrents/edk's I have in my list. I've seen that it's cpu usage is higger.
as 2.8.7 is working just fine, I supose there's some problem whit this build.
could you try compiling a new one, maybe using 2.9.0 release code (not CVS), without libmagic.
maybe we could try also compiling with updated libs:; glibc2.3.3, zlib-1.2.3 (like 2.8.7 I have that works fine) and maybe a newer Linux Kernel (I'm using 2.6.15). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiralvoice Sage
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 3982 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@Zeus: Which Ocaml version was used to compile MLDonkey 2.8.7, which one for 2.9.0? _________________ Link overview and precompiled cores here: http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/DownloadLinks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fabtar Sage

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 1575 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose my cores are simply unable to make DNS resolution on no-debian systems ... _________________ ARM,ARMEL,MIPS,MIPSEL,POWERPC mldonkey cores: http://fabtar.ygrek.org.ua/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZeusII neophyte

Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| spiralvoice wrote: | | @Zeus: Which Ocaml version was used to compile MLDonkey 2.8.7, which one for 2.9.0? |
seems that the same version 3.08.3
| fabtar wrote: | I suppose my cores are simply unable to make DNS resolution on no-debian systems ... |
um, well, DNS works just fine for some time  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiralvoice Sage
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 3982 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@fabtar: Using Debian Sarge for compiling is ok, but please use at least
a self-compiled Ocaml 3.09.3, 3.08.3 is pretty outdated...
My Linux cores are compiled on Debian Sarge, its gcc-3.4 package +
gcc-3.4 compiled Ocaml 3.10.0. _________________ Link overview and precompiled cores here: http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/DownloadLinks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZeusII neophyte

Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking...
does this compiled CVS version include the patch high bittorrent CPU usage bug? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiralvoice Sage
Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 3982 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ZeusII wrote: | | does this compiled CVS version include the patch high bittorrent CPU usage bug? |
Which value has share_scan_interval on your system? _________________ Link overview and precompiled cores here: http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/DownloadLinks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZeusII neophyte

Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| spiralvoice wrote: | | ZeusII wrote: | | does this compiled CVS version include the patch high bittorrent CPU usage bug? |
Which value has share_scan_interval on your system? |
1.
I changed it last night to 60 to try. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|
|
|