| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gdgdgddgd
neophyte
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1
Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pango
Sage
Joined: 31 Oct 2002
Posts: 2436
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I'm becoming a bit sceptical about Norton AV performance as of late, because several times I've found some more viruses by running Panda's online scanner (activescan) or Eset's free trial version on boxen already scanned by the installed NAV... (Frankly I haven't tried running them in reverse order, results could be interesting).
But not including Symantec's scores in a comparative test "because of errors" ? Come on.
(I'd really like to know what the 38 Linux viruses/trojan he used are, btw)
And to add to the mess of this off-topic thread:
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/tests.xml?200411 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
